Calculus I · Limits and Continuity · practice
Finite Limit Practice Problems
Visual study stop
Read the picture before the symbols
Pause at each graph long enough to say what the input is doing, what the output is doing, and which feature supports the next mathematical decision.
Read this graph as text
A limit at a removable hole. The line y = x + 2 is drawn on two explicit domains, one to the left of 2 and one to the right. An open circle at (2, 4) marks the missing value. Dashed horizontal and vertical guides identify x = 2 and y = 4, so the common approached height remains clear without relying on color.
The curve is split into left and right branches and the missing value is an open circle with dashed coordinate guides.
Why it matters: Show that a two-sided limit depends on nearby outputs even when the function is undefined at the target input.
Factoring and cancellation do not fill the missing point in the original function. They reveal a simpler nearby rule whose height exposes the finite limit at the removable hole.
Section 2 Exercises
A. Direct substitution and limit laws
Show answer
.
Answer 1 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 2 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 3 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 4 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 5 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 6 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 7 from the source-traced unit appendix.If and , find .
Show answer
.
Answer 8 from the source-traced unit appendix.With the same limits, find .
Show answer
.
Answer 9 from the source-traced unit appendix.With the same limits, find .
Show answer
.
Answer 10 from the source-traced unit appendix.State why the quotient law cannot be used when the denominator's limit is zero.
Show answer
Division by a limit of zero is not defined by the quotient law.
Answer 11 from the source-traced unit appendix.Give an example where direct substitution produces a real number and therefore no algebraic simplification is needed.
Show answer
Answers vary; for example .
Answer 12 from the source-traced unit appendix.B. Factoring
Show answer
.
Answer 13 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 14 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 15 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 16 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 17 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 18 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 19 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 20 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 21 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 22 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 23 from the source-traced unit appendix.Explain why the cancelled expression and original expression may differ at the target but have the same limit.
Show answer
The expressions agree at every sufficiently close input except possibly the target, which the limit excludes.
Answer 24 from the source-traced unit appendix.C. Radical limits
Show answer
.
Answer 25 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 26 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 27 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 28 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 29 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 30 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 31 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 32 from the source-traced unit appendix.D. Complex fractions
Show answer
.
Answer 33 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 34 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 35 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 36 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 37 from the source-traced unit appendix., where .
Show answer
.
Answer 38 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 39 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 40 from the source-traced unit appendix.E. Absolute values and piecewise forms
Show answer
.
Answer 41 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 42 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 43 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 44 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 45 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 46 from the source-traced unit appendix.Let Find the limit at .
Show answer
.
Answer 47 from the source-traced unit appendix.Let Find both one-sided limits at .
Show answer
.
Answer 48 from the source-traced unit appendix.F. Mixed exam practice
Show answer
.
Answer 49 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 50 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 51 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 52 from the source-traced unit appendix.Show answer
.
Answer 53 from the source-traced unit appendix.A student cancels in and obtains . Explain why this cancellation is valid for , and distinguish it from cancelling a term across addition without factoring.
Show answer
Valid cancellation occurs after factoring ; terms cannot be cancelled separately across addition.
Answer 54 from the source-traced unit appendix.Design a limit whose value is .
Show answer
Example: .
Answer 55 from the source-traced unit appendix.Design a limit whose value is .
Show answer
Example: .
Answer 56 from the source-traced unit appendix.Design a limit that does not exist.
Show answer
Example: is under substitution but does not exist.
Answer 57 from the source-traced unit appendix.Write a short decision procedure for determining whether to factor, rationalize, combine fractions, or split into one-sided cases.
Show answer
Substitute, identify the form, then choose structure-specific algebra as summarized in the section decision tree.
Answer 58 from the source-traced unit appendix.Answers begin in the referenced section.
After the explanation
Use the section idea
What did direct substitution reveal, and which algebraic move removes the obstacle without changing nearby behavior?
Substitution is a diagnostic first move: a real number usually finishes the problem, while an indeterminate form asks for a structural rewrite.
Match the obstacle to the algebra—factor polynomial zeros, rationalize radicals, combine complex fractions, and split absolute values into one-sided cases.
Zero over zero is not an answer, and cancellation is legal only for factors after the expression has been rewritten as a product.
You are ready to move on when you can justify why each rewrite preserves nearby values even if the original expression is undefined at the target.
Source & rights
Original instruction with traceable references.
The exposition is original. No Active Calculus exercise is reproduced verbatim. Public-domain examples were modernized and recomposed when used as inspiration.
The verified handoff declares original composition and requires owner provenance review. BetterGrades-original material remains separate from public-domain references; no source textbook PDF is published here.