BetterGrades Algebra · Unit A3 · Review

Inequalities, Absolute Value, and Formulas: cumulative review

Inequalities, Absolute Value, and Formulas: cumulative review for Inequalities, Absolute Value, and Formulas, with an explicit attempt-first assessment blueprint.

Assessment

25 concrete questions

Suggested time: 35-60 minutes.

Grading boundary: mixed self-check + selected deterministic checks

Cumulative share: 25% prior units

Each question is fully authored and linked to a lesson skill. Detailed scoring criteria and worked solutions stay protected until a substantive attempt is submitted.

Open the protected response guide

Open-response checkA3.3

Create the representation most useful for checking this result: Start with 4<2-4 < 2. Multiply by 5-5 and justify the new comparison. Use an inequality, interval notation, and a number-line description; each must show the same endpoints, inclusion, and direction.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.3

A learner reports “6>15-6 > -15.” but omits the original-condition check. Explain the risk before deciding whether the result is supported.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.3

Repair a solution that skips “The scale changes 66 to 2-2 and 3-3 to 11.” while solving: Explain why dividing 6>36 > -3 by 3-3 gives 2<1-2 < 1.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.3

In this why negative scaling reverses order case, change one numerical value, solve the revised problem, and identify which parts of the original method still apply: Start with 2<52 < 5. Multiply both sides by 3-3 and explain the resulting comparison.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.3

Connect the opening situation “Reflect two ordered points through zero.” to the algebraic structure used in the worked case. Define quantities and units before writing any equation.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.3

Explain why the method for why negative scaling reverses order is valid here and name one nearby problem where it would not apply.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.3

Compare the conclusions of all three worked cases with this lesson outcome—Explain order reversal through reflection and numerical comparison. Explain what remains invariant across them.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.3

Exit check: solve and verify without referring to the displayed steps. Start with 4<2-4 < 2. Multiply by 5-5 and justify the new comparison.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.3

Exit check: solve and verify without referring to the displayed steps. Explain why dividing 6>36 > -3 by 3-3 gives 2<1-2 < 1.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Classify the mathematical object and requested action in this lesson case: Translate 2<x5-2 < x \le 5 into interval notation and describe its number-line graph.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

State the central definition behind this outcome: Translate among inequalities, number-line graphs, and interval notation.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Before calculating, list every sign, endpoint, unit, grouping, or domain condition that can affect: Translate 2<x5-2 < x \le 5 into interval notation and describe its number-line graph.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Explain why this opening move is valid: Use a parenthesis at 2-2 because 2-2 is excluded.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Translate 2<x5-2 < x \le 5 into interval notation and describe its number-line graph.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Write x1x \le -1 or x>4x > 4 in interval notation and describe the endpoints.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Translate [2,5)[-2, 5)(1,8](1, 8] into a compound inequality.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Verify the proposed result “(2,5],(-2, 5], with an open endpoint at 2-2 and a closed endpoint at 55.” against the original statement.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Complete the calculation after “The first ray contains 1,-1, so use a bracket there.” in this problem: Write x1x \le -1 or x>4x > 4 in interval notation and describe the endpoints.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Name and justify the most efficient first move, then solve: Translate [2,5)[-2, 5)(1,8](1, 8] into a compound inequality.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Compare the methods used in these two cases and identify the structural reason they differ: Write x1x \le -1 or x>4x > 4 in interval notation and describe the endpoints. Translate [2,5)[-2, 5)(1,8](1, 8] into a compound inequality.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Create the representation most useful for checking this result: Write x1x \le -1 or x>4x > 4 in interval notation and describe the endpoints. Use an inequality, interval notation, and a number-line description; each must show the same endpoints, inclusion, and direction.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

A learner reports “(2,5],(-2, 5], with an open endpoint at 2-2 and a closed endpoint at 55.” but omits the original-condition check. Explain the risk before deciding whether the result is supported.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Repair a solution that skips “It ends just below 55 because [2,5)[-2, 5) excludes 55.” while solving: Translate [2,5)[-2, 5)(1,8](1, 8] into a compound inequality.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

In this interval notation and endpoint meaning case, change one numerical value, solve the revised problem, and identify which parts of the original method still apply: Translate 2<x5-2 < x \le 5 into interval notation and describe its number-line graph.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Open-response checkA3.4

Connect the opening situation “Encode an allowed temperature or measurement range.” to the algebraic structure used in the worked case. Define quantities and units before writing any equation.

Write a complete attempt before opening the response guide.

Attempt once to unlock the response guide

Complete a substantive attempt to unlock the protected solution and scoring criteria.

Source & rights

Original storyboard, rights-separated references.

Public page content comes from the BetterGrades Algebra editorial storyboard supplied by the owner. Reference books named in provenance remain separate and are not copied into the application.