Evaluating Limits Worksheet with Complete Solutions
Twenty-four limits that progress from substitution to algebraic, one-sided, and infinite behavior.
What is included
Practice evaluating limits with a printable student worksheet, answer key, and accessible worked solutions.
Skills assessed
- direct substitution
- factoring
- rationalization
- one-sided limits
- limits at infinity
Prerequisites
- function notation
- algebraic factoring
Download this resource
No email address or account is required.
Ready for an honest first attempt?
This control sends only the resource id and type—never your answers or identity.
Printable preview
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- For , evaluate the limit as .
- For , evaluate the limit as .
- For , evaluate the limit as .
- For , evaluate the limit as .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
Complete worked solutions
Every problem has a source-matched answer and independently reviewed derivation.
Problem 1: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Direct substitution matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- The expression is continuous at the target input .
- Substitute the target and simplify to obtain .
Problem 2: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Direct substitution matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- The expression is continuous at the target input .
- Substitute the target and simplify to obtain .
Problem 3: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Direct substitution matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- The expression is continuous at the target input .
- Substitute the target and simplify to obtain .
Problem 4: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Direct substitution matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- The expression is continuous at the target input .
- Substitute the target and simplify to obtain .
Problem 5: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Direct substitution matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- The expression is continuous at the target input .
- Substitute the target and simplify to obtain .
Problem 6: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Direct substitution matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- The expression is continuous at the target input .
- Substitute the target and simplify to obtain .
Problem 7: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Factoring and cancellation matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Factor the vanishing numerator as .
- Cancel the common factor only for nearby inputs, then substitute the target.
- The simplified expression approaches .
Problem 8: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Factoring and cancellation matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Factor the vanishing numerator as .
- Cancel the common factor only for nearby inputs, then substitute the target.
- The simplified expression approaches .
Problem 9: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Factoring and cancellation matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Factor the vanishing numerator as .
- Cancel the common factor only for nearby inputs, then substitute the target.
- The simplified expression approaches .
Problem 10: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Factoring and cancellation matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Factor the vanishing numerator as .
- Cancel the common factor only for nearby inputs, then substitute the target.
- The simplified expression approaches .
Problem 11: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Factoring and cancellation matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Factor the vanishing numerator as .
- Cancel the common factor only for nearby inputs, then substitute the target.
- The simplified expression approaches .
Problem 12: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Factoring and cancellation matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Factor the vanishing numerator as .
- Cancel the common factor only for nearby inputs, then substitute the target.
- The simplified expression approaches .
Problem 13: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Rationalization matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate .
- Use the difference-of-squares identity and cancel the factor that tends to zero.
- Substitution in the simplified expression gives .
Problem 14: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Rationalization matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate .
- Use the difference-of-squares identity and cancel the factor that tends to zero.
- Substitution in the simplified expression gives .
Problem 15: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Rationalization matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate .
- Use the difference-of-squares identity and cancel the factor that tends to zero.
- Substitution in the simplified expression gives .
Problem 16: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Rationalization matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate .
- Use the difference-of-squares identity and cancel the factor that tends to zero.
- Substitution in the simplified expression gives .
Problem 17: For , evaluate the limit as .
Answer:
Why this method: One-sided branch analysis matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Select the branch determined by the direction of approach.
- Evaluate nearby behavior on that branch; the value assigned at the endpoint does not control the limit.
- The required approach gives .
Problem 18: For , evaluate the limit as .
Answer:
Why this method: One-sided branch analysis matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Select the branch determined by the direction of approach.
- Evaluate nearby behavior on that branch; the value assigned at the endpoint does not control the limit.
- The required approach gives .
Problem 19: For , evaluate the limit as .
Answer:
Why this method: One-sided branch analysis matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Select the branch determined by the direction of approach.
- Evaluate nearby behavior on that branch; the value assigned at the endpoint does not control the limit.
- The required approach gives .
Problem 20: For , evaluate the limit as .
Answer:
Why this method: One-sided branch analysis matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Select the branch determined by the direction of approach.
- Evaluate nearby behavior on that branch; the value assigned at the endpoint does not control the limit.
- The required approach gives .
Problem 21: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Dominant-term or sign analysis matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Identify the dominant behavior: equal degrees.
- Divide by the highest relevant power or use the sign of the vanishing factor.
- The limit is .
Problem 22: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Dominant-term or sign analysis matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Identify the dominant behavior: denominator degree is larger.
- Divide by the highest relevant power or use the sign of the vanishing factor.
- The limit is .
Problem 23: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Dominant-term or sign analysis matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Identify the dominant behavior: equal degrees.
- Divide by the highest relevant power or use the sign of the vanishing factor.
- The limit is .
Problem 24: Evaluate .
Answer:
Why this method: Dominant-term or sign analysis matches the mathematical structure before any algebraic cleanup.
- Identify the dominant behavior: positive denominator approaching zero.
- Divide by the highest relevant power or use the sign of the vanishing factor.
- The limit is .
Common errors
- Substituting before checking whether the form is determinate.
- Cancelling terms instead of common factors.
- Ignoring approach direction at jumps.